Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02379 2
Original file (BC 2013 02379 2.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-02379

		COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NOT INDICATED 


________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Purple 
Heart (PH) medal.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 6 Mar 14, the Board considered and denied applicant’s original 
request for award of the Purple Heart (PH) medal for an injury he 
incurred in Vietnam on 12 May 67.  The Board determined that the 
evidence provided by the applicant was insufficient to conclude 
that he was the victim of an error or injustice, noting that 
although he provided recent medical documentation indicating a 
shrapnel injury to his knee, the applicant had not provided any 
evidence showing the injury was the direct result of the action 
of an enemy.  For an accounting of the facts and circumstances 
surrounding his request, and the rationale for the earlier 
decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings, with 
attachments, at Exhibit E.

By a letter dated 28 Apr 14, the applicant disagrees with 
conclusion that there was no evidence of an error or an 
injustice.  He believes his documentation was sufficient to 
indicate his injury met the criteria for award of the PH medal.  
He also noted that the Board’s decision incorrectly indicated 
his injury was to his left knee, but his injury was to the 
pelvic bone and not his knee.  Furthermore, the injury was not 
documented at the time incurred because he was not aware of the 
metal object over the right pelvis until he had x-rays taken at 
the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) for his spinal 
problems.  The only explanation he has for the presence of the 
metal object is the incident where he came under fire of enemy 
rockets and mortar at Bien Hoa Airbase in 1967, which is well 
documented.  He further requests the Board’s documentation 
relating to the location of his injury be amended to accurately 
reflect the pelvic bone and not his knee (Exhibit F).

________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

After again reviewing the evidence of record, the applicant’s 
prior submission, the additional evidence provided in support of 
his appeal, we are not convinced the requested relief is 
warranted.  While the original Record of Proceedings (ROP) 
erroneously identified the applicant’s injury as a knee injury, 
rather than a pelvic injury, irrespective of this administrative 
error, we find the evidence presented insufficient to conclude 
the applicant’s purported pelvic injury meets the criteria for 
award of the Purple Heart (PH) Medal.  Furthermore, although the 
applicant has presented documentation describing the attack at 
Bien Hoa Air Base, Vietnam; there was no evidence to show the 
applicant incurred this injury during this attack or due to 
action of the enemy.  Even if we assume for the sake of argument 
that such an attack occurred and involved the applicant, the PH 
medal criteria requires that the injury required medical 
attention at the time and the applicant has provided no 
documentation indicating that he required treatment for his 
purported injury in the aftermath of the attack.  While we are 
not unmindful or unappreciative of the applicant’s service to 
his Nation, in the absence of evidence substantiating the injury 
he sustained meets the criteria for award of the PH Medal, we 
find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not meet 
the criteria for reconsideration; the application was denied 
without a personal appearance; and the application will only be 
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant 
evidence not considered with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-02379 in Executive Session on 17 Jul 14, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Chair
	, Member
	, Member

?
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-02379 was considered:

	Exhibit E.  Record of Proceedings, dated 14 Mar 14,
	            w/exhibits.
	Exhibit F.  Letter, Applicant, dated 28 Apr 14.

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02379

    Original file (BC 2013 02379.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. While the applicant has presented recent medical documentation indicating a shrapnel injury to his knee, he has presented no evidence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-04989

    Original file (BC-2011-04989.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04989 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal. A physical lesion was not required, provided the concussion or other form of injury received was due to direct enemy, opposing armed force, or hostile foreign force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03374

    Original file (BC-2012-03374.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Each request is considered based on the policies and criteria in use at the time the veteran was injured, and the determination is dependent on the documentary evidence presented. Furthermore, a review of his medical record reveals the applicant received medical treatment in 1970 for injuries he sustained due to a rocket attack in Bien Hoa AB, Vietnam. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00921

    Original file (BC-2004-00921.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. The PH is awarded for wounds received as a direct result of enemy actions (i.e., gunshot or shrapnel wounds, hand-to-hand combat wounds, forced aircraft bail out injuries, etc.). In this respect, we note the PH is awarded for wounds received as a direct result of enemy actions and it is necessary the wound required or received treatment by medical personnel.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01918

    Original file (BC-2005-01918.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Medical records pertaining to the applicant’s DVA claim indicate he reported he had sustained a posterior left shoulder injury when he jumped out a cockpit of a grounded fighter during a rocket attack when stationed at Bien Hoa AB in Jun 68. A member must provide documentation to support the injury was a direct result of enemy action and required or received medical treatment by medical personnel. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01465

    Original file (BC-2005-01465.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Purple Heart Review Board (PHRB) considered and denied applicant’s request for the PH on 1 November 2005. Applicant’s personal statement is noted; however, after thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, to include his service medical records, we find no corroborative evidence to establish that he was treated for wounds received as a direct result of enemy action during a rocket attack on 28 February 1968. ________________________________________________________________ The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04001

    Original file (BC-2011-04001.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s record states he received medical treatment in Jun 70 for a back injury he experienced at Bien Hoa Air Base, Vietnam, while working on a construction project. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant’s contentions, we find no evidence which would lead us to believe the applicant’s injuries were a direct result of enemy action as required for award of the PH. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-03684

    Original file (BC-1997-03684.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant entered active duty on 15 Aug 66. A) provided a statement to the DVA; however, he does not mention any enemy-action injury to the applicant. On 11 Mar 97, his case was forwarded to the PH Review Board where it was determined that his medical documentation did not support his claim of injury.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9703684

    Original file (9703684.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant entered active duty on 15 Aug 66. A) provided a statement to the DVA; however, he does not mention any enemy-action injury to the applicant. On 11 Mar 97, his case was forwarded to the PH Review Board where it was determined that his medical documentation did not support his claim of injury.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01926

    Original file (BC-2013-01926.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPSID states that after a thorough review of the applicant's official military personnel record there are no documents indicating he was recommended for or awarded the PH. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the PH criteria in effect at the time of the applicant’s injury, we are not persuaded that he has met his burden of proving that he should be entitled to the PH. Exhibit B.